Skip to content
recurance

Sheldon Woodford

16 May 2016 · Coroner Sarah Whitby · Hampshire Central

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. SASH document not identifiable in reception

    “That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”
  2. 2. Inadequate officer training on ACCT processes

    “Training of Officers in the ACCT processes.”

Linked reports

Raised again laterMichael Folley21 Jun 2019 · 3 years 1 month later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”

Later report

“The suicide/self harm warning alert (SASH) at page 9 of the PER was meant to be completed if there was a risk of self-harm or suicide since arrest or within the last month. In other words, it was felt the relevant period to be considered was not just the current period of detention but also anything relevant within a month before arrest.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: SASH form not identified or completed at reception

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Sheldon Woodford · Recurance