SASH form not identified or completed at reception
HMP Winchester received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 16 May 2016 and 21 Jun 2019.
They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
No published response from HMP Winchester was found for the earlier reports.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ No published response from HMP Winchester was found for this report.
- 3 years 1 month laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“The suicide/self harm warning alert (SASH) at page 9 of the PER was meant to be completed if there was a risk of self-harm or suicide since arrest or within the last month. In other words, it was felt the relevant period to be considered was not just the current period of detention but also anything relevant within a month before arrest.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:SASHrelevant
HMP Winchester responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to HMP Winchester
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2016 → 2019Michael Folley3 years 1 month after Sheldon Woodford · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth concerns involve the suicide/self‑harm warning alert (SASH) form used during reception/detention. The earlier report notes staff cannot identify the SASH document, while the later report notes the form was not completed when required.
Sheldon Woodford · 16 May 2016
“That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Michael Folley · 21 Jun 2019
“The suicide/self harm warning alert (SASH) at page 9 of the PER was meant to be completed if there was a risk of self-harm or suicide since arrest or within the last month. In other words, it was felt the relevant period to be considered was not just the current period of detention but also anything relevant within a month before arrest.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
No published response from HMP Winchester was found for this report.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to HMP Winchester at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 → 2019 | 0.69 | 0.19 | Closely related · 0.90 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.