Skip to content
recurance

Roy Sinclair

13 May 2026 · Coroner Sean Cummings · Milton Keynes

This report repeats 6 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inaccurate ACCT documentation

    “serious difficulty in the recording, communication, and use of ACCT documentation”
  2. 2. unclear overdose management framework

    “no formal policy then in place governing paracetamol overdose”
  3. 3. uninvestigated source of paracetamol

    “No prison intelligence report was raised after the first reported overdose”
  4. 4. unmanaged prisoner debt

    “debt to other prisoners connected with vapes”
  5. 5. operational pressures compromising safeguarding

    “serious staffing shortages, recruitment and retention difficulties”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningLiam Lambert20 Sept 2016 · 9 years 8 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The ACCT document was not completed fully, did not accompany [the deceased] around the prison as it should have and not all appropriate individuals were invited to the reviews.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“After the first overdose, there was a handover miscommunication as to whether the ACCT remained open or had been closed.”
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT training leading to incomplete documentation
Repeats an earlier warningMatthew Russell27 Nov 2016 · 9 years 5 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“Ensuring that all staff with responsibility for patients in prison have received adequate foundation training and on-‐‐going training in the ACCT procedure.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“After the first overdose, there was a handover miscommunication as to whether the ACCT remained open or had been closed.”
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT documentation and communication
Repeats an earlier warningSarah Reed28 Jul 2017 · 8 years 9 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“(9) The jury also found that not all members of the ACCT Review team fully reviewed the ACCT document before making a decision.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“1.ACCT documentation and operation. The evidence disclosed serious difficulty in the recording, communication, and use of ACCT documentation.”
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT documentation and communication
Repeats an earlier warningDaniel Akam10 Dec 2019 · 6 years 5 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“Failure to carry out ACCT observations recorded in the ACCT log”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“serious difficulty in the recording, communication, and use of ACCT documentation”
Full chain: Inaccurate ACCT documentation affecting prisoner safety
Repeats an earlier warningThomas Huntley14 May 2023 · 3 years earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

Earlier report

“In evidence it was clear that the ACCT document was the only written document used for sharing information between the healthcare staff employed by the NHS trust and the prison security staff.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“After the first overdose, there was a handover miscommunication as to whether the ACCT remained open or had been closed.”
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT training leading to incomplete documentation
Repeats an earlier warningFrazer Williams31 May 2024 · 1 year 11 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.86 · high

Earlier report

“The ACCT records were incomplete and inadequate. The last case review took place on 1st March 2022. The next case review was scheduled for 3rd March 2022, however this did not take place and there was no further case review prior to [the deceased]'s death.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The evidence disclosed serious difficulty in the recording, communication, and use of ACCT documentation. After the first overdose, there was a handover miscommunication as to whether the ACCT remained open or had been closed.”
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT training leading to incomplete documentation

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error