Skip to content
recurance

Mark Bartholomew

21 May 2014 · Coroner Simon Nelson · Manchester (North)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate emergency service response

    “the response to external emergency services was inadequate”
  2. 2. delay in ligature release

    “time was very much of the essence”
  3. 3. inadequate equipment checks

    “the practice of daily checks for equipment has now been superseded by a check at the commencement of each shift”
  4. 4. inadequate observation documentation

    “actual observation sheet apparently in use at present indicates a poor level of detail as to who and when it is completed”

Linked reports

Raised again laterKimberley Lindfield2 Feb 2015 · 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“actual observation sheet apparently in use at present indicates a poor level of detail as to who and when it is completed”

Later report

“there should be a clear written policy or protocol setting out what those observations actually involve (e.g. what 1 in every 15 minutes means and precisely what should be recorded)”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of written observation protocol for child and adolescent mental health unit

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Mark Bartholomew · Recurance