Skip to content
recurance

Lack of written observation protocol for child and adolescent mental health unit

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate3 reports · 2014–2015No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 30 Apr 2014 and 2 Feb 2015.

They came from 3 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

3
reports
3
different coroners
2014–2015
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Samiyo Farah↗

    30 Apr 2014 · Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

    “Observation protocol - there is no national guidance/policy on the observation of children and adolescents within specialist mental health units. At present, clinicians are forced to adopt/adapt policies applied to adults with mental health issues.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Mark Bartholomew↗

    21 May 2014 · Simon Nelson · Manchester (North)

    “actual observation sheet apparently in use at present indicates a poor level of detail as to who and when it is completed”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.

  3. 8 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Kimberley Lindfield↗

    2 Feb 2015 · Nigel Meadows · Manchester (City)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “Whenever an increased level of observations is initiated pending a mental health assessment because of the concern about a patient's mental state and/or self harrm/suicidal behaviour there should be a clear written policy or protocol setting out what those observations actually involve (e.g. what 1 in every 15 minutes means and precisely what should be recorded)”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:mentalhealthprotocol

    Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “All patients presenting with symptoms of mental illness/mental disorder and/or after reported self harm/suicidal behaviour will now be automatically referred for a mental health assessment to be conducted as soon as possible whether that referral is from A&E or any ward. Pending that assessment mental health staff can give advice by phone concerning the patient's interim care and management.”

    Stated timescale: as soon as possible

  4. All reports to Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error