Skip to content
recurance

Jude Lloyd

4 Oct 2021 · Coroner Nigel Meadows · Manchester City

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of diabetes monitoring and management

    “No thorough comprehensive risk review and care plan was formulated in relation to his Diabetes monitoring and management prior to his discharge from the inpatient unit”
  2. 2. lack of mental capacity assessment

    “No appropriate formal mental capacity assessments were made and properly recorded”
  3. 3. inadequate transfer and communication

    “The transfer and communication process from inpatient care to the CMHT was inadequate and incomplete”
  4. 4. lack of GP contact during inpatient stay

    “No appropriate contacts were made with the GP whilst the deceased was an in-patient to obtain relevant clinical information”
  5. 5. gap in specialist advice for physical health

    “Whilst a psychiatric inpatient and suffering from a serious physical health condition which requires monitoring and treatment it was not possible to obtain appropriate specialist advice because the deceased was not an inpatient in hospital and was not registered with a GP in that area”
  6. 6. lack of audit system

    “There was no robust audit system for checking compliance with the Trusts own policies and protocols in particular with regard to medical record keeping, risk assessments and reviews”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningStephanie Daniels13 Dec 2013 · 7 years 10 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“without appropriate audit and clinical/nursing leadership this may prove to be ineffective.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“There was no robust audit system for checking compliance with the Trusts own policies and protocols in particular with regard to medical record keeping, risk assessments and reviews.”
Full chain: Inadequate audit of observations and documentation
Raised again laterRowan Thompson1 Nov 2022 · 1 year 1 month later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“There was no robust audit system for checking compliance with the Trusts own policies and protocols in particular with regard to medical record keeping, risk assessments and reviews.”

Later report

“System by which observations and documentation are audited lacks rigour and is ineffective.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate audit of observations and documentation

Responses

2021-0329-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action

“The Trust's RCA report highlighted that in respect of inpatient monitoring of Mr [name redacted] diabetes, the care plans and risk assessments were completed on signs and symptoms of hypoglycaemia, but it was recognised these were not tailored to Mr [name redacted] specific needs. A further recommendation was to raise awareness and education on monitoring for signs of diabetic ketoacidosis for CMHT staff. To address this an eLearning training package is in place in respect of supporting and monitoring physical”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error