Skip to content
recurance

Isa Mushtaq

24 Sept 2014 · Coroner Sara Lewis · Manchester (City)

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inconsistent interpretation of antenatal CTG leading to delayed or inappropriate response

    “In clinical practice the fetal CTG continues to be a source of problems, both in interpretation and in what degree of action should be taken”
  2. 2. misapplication of intrapartum CTG guidance to antenatal monitoring

    “Reliance on the NICE guidance for intrapartum CTG monitoring to interpret antenatal CTG features is of limited value because: (i) It is not intended for such use and therefore such practice is arguably not evidence based (ii) It is much more common for fetal heart traces not to look normal during labour (in the region 20 -30 % outwith normal parameters) therefore the significance of such abnormal traces may not be the same in labour as compared to when identified antenatally. (iii) Only a very”
  3. 3. lack of national guidance for antepartum CTG abnormalities

    “There should be a review to consider whether national guidance on antepartum CTG monitoring and interpretation where there are abnormalities or unusual features would lead to safer, evidence based management of such cases”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningArthur Brockett-Deakins25 Feb 2014 · 7 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“When to escalate concerns about a CTG: With regard to not escalating an abnormal CTG that ran for about half an hour after augmentation of labour, reliance was placed by midwives on a clause of NICE Clinical Guidelines, Intrapartum Care, 2007”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Reliance on the NICE guidance for intrapartum CTG monitoring to interpret antenatal CTG features is of limited value because:”
Full chain: Inappropriate use of intrapartum CTG guidance for antenatal monitoring
Raised again laterMaxim Karpovich22 Feb 2017 · 2 years 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“In clinical practice the fetal CTG continues to be a source of problems, both in interpretation and in what degree of action should be taken.”

Later report

“This training should address pattern recognition, pathophysiology of foetal heart rate changes, clinical scenarios with CTG's and appropriate responses.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inconsistent antenatal CTG interpretation leading to delayed response
Raised again laterAlonzo Wood18 Mar 2025 · 10 years 6 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“Currently there is no detailed national guidance on antepartum CTG assessment and therefore no guidance as to the circumstances in which CTG changes or abnormalities require urgent delivery.”

Later report

“clinicians consider that there is insufficient guidance as to the management actions that should be taken in the event of an abnormal antenatal CTG”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inconsistent interpretation of antenatal CTG leading to delayed response

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error