Skip to content
recurance

Inappropriate use of intrapartum CTG guidance for antenatal monitoring

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2014–2014No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 25 Feb 2014 and 24 Sept 2014.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2014–2014
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Arthur Brockett-Deakins↗

    25 Feb 2014 · Andrew Harris · London (Inner South)

    “When to escalate concerns about a CTG: With regard to not escalating an abnormal CTG that ran for about half an hour after augmentation of labour, reliance was placed by midwives on a clause of NICE Clinical Guidelines, Intrapartum Care, 2007”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗
  2. 7 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Isa Mushtaq↗

    24 Sept 2014 · Sara Lewis · Manchester (City)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “Reliance on the NICE guidance for intrapartum CTG monitoring to interpret antenatal CTG features is of limited value because:”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:RelianceNICEintrapartum

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  3. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error