Skip to content
recurance

Absence of on-site defibrillator during training

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2015–2023No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Ministry of Defence received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 8 Sept 2015 and 28 Jul 2023.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Ministry of Defence was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2023
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    David Efemena↗

    8 Sept 2015 · Nadia Persaud · London (East)

    “The lack of an AED and AED trained first aider at this type of cadet activity, poses a risk to future cadets.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Ministry of Defence was found for this report.

  2. 7 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Benjamin McQueen↗

    28 Jul 2023 · Rt Hon Sir Ernest Ryder · Dorset

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “I am concerned that in such safety-critical military diving training, the dive support staff did not have available to them a defibrillator of their own either on the supporting safety boats or on land.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Ministry of Defence responded, stating 4 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “Carrying spare breathing apparatus cylinders in safety boats in addition to those carried by the stand-by diver where this is practicable”
    “When SCADE is employed by the standby diver within un-marked swimming operations, consideration within the Dive Project Plan / Risk Assessment must be given as to the availability of a second Diving Life Support Equipment (DLSE) at immediate notice”

    2 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  3. All reports to Ministry of Defence

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error