Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate english proficiency hindering communication and safety

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2017–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Care Quality Commission received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 8 May 2017 and 9 Apr 2025.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2017–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    David Sheppard↗

    8 May 2017 · Louise Hunt · Birmingham and Solihull

    “The initial nurse who attended the deceased after the emergency call had poor English and needed to give evidence at the inquest through an interpreter.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Care Quality Commission responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “the provider has taken a number of measures to address concerns including, but not limited to, the provision of training with first aid, CPR and choking prioritised in the induction process, as well as documentation training sessions and the introduction of an incident reporting questionnaire”

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    [PDF] Choking Incident Report Checklist - NJ.gov ↗
  2. 7 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Bernard Lyon↗

    9 Apr 2025 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The home relied on agency staff who the inquest was told struggled to have sufficient grasp of the English language to understand instructions given and to communicate with residents.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:inquestEnglish

    Care Quality Commission responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Care Quality Commission

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error