Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate paramedic ECG interpretation training

Identical hazardConfidence 0.92 · high2 reports · 2016–2023 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Health and Care Professions Council received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 29 Nov 2016 and 15 Nov 2023.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2016–2023
years
0.92
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Rex Hall↗

    29 Nov 2016 · Emma Brown · Birmingham and Solihull

    “one of the paramedics who qualified in 2015 after a 2 year foundation degree gave evidence that he had never had any formal testing on interpretation of 12 lead ECG”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Health and Care Professions Council responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “We have taken significant steps within the sector to support the development of paramedic practice. In particular, in March 2018 we determined it necessary to raise the threshold level of entry to the Register to degree level (levels 6/9/10 on the relevant UK qualifications frameworks). The threshold level for entry to the Register for paramedics was changed to degree level for the following reasons: e A large majority of respondents to the public consultation argued that degree level was necess”

    Stated timescale: September 2021

  2. 7 years later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Lauren Smith↗

    15 Nov 2023 · Joanne Lees · Black Country

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.92 · higha different coroner
    “Paramedic [REDACTED] gave evidence at inquest that she'd never heard of Q waves before and didn't see the ST elevation on the ecg”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:gaveevidencenever

    Health and Care Professions Council responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Health and Care Professions Council

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error