Skip to content
recurance

Inadequate mental health communication during welfare checks

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2015–2025No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Metropolitan Police received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 21 Jul 2015 and 25 Mar 2025.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2025
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Anne Wilson↗

    21 Jul 2015 · Sonia Hayes · London (South)

    “(b) an example of how to manage a request for a welfare check concerning the mental health of an individual”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Metropolitan Police responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 9 years 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Oladeji Omishore↗

    25 Mar 2025 · Fiona J Wilcox · Inner West London

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “dispatchers may require training in relation to the importance of passing on possible mental health concerns for the subject over the airwaves given the increased use of taser in black men and those suffering with mental ill health”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:mentalhealth

    Metropolitan Police responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Metropolitan Police

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error