Skip to content
recurance

Zawdie Bascom

20 Jun 2016 · Coroner Nadia Persaud · London (East)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of pain score recording at triage

    “Mr [name redacted] presented in severe pain to A&E. This was his primary presenting problem. Despite this, there was no recording of his pain score on triage into A&E.”
  2. 2. inadequate documentation of analgesia effect on pain score

    “Analgesic medication was administered at 03:45 and a pain score recorded at 05:15 of 9/10. The doctor who recorded the pain score at that time could not recall whether he had any regard to the fact that analgesia had been given, when he noted the score of 9/10.”
  3. 3. failure to record pain scores after analgesia

    “Further analgesia in the form of tramadol was given at 05:30. There was no further pain score recorded following this analgesia. No pain score was recorded prior to discharge.”
  4. 4. action plan omits severe pain cases

    “It was noted in evidence that the Trust carries out pain audits in compliance with the College of Emergency Medicine. The Consultant who gave evidence was unable to comment upon the practice at Newham University Hospital. The updated action plan referred only to regular audits in relation to sickle cell, fractured hip, and pain in children. The updated action plan does not address the circumstances where patients present to A&E in severe pain.”
  5. 5. absence of systematic pain assessment by nursing staff

    “No pain score was recorded by any member of the nursing team. There was no evidence of any systematic assessment of pain (for example, response to analgesia).”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error