Skip to content
recurance

Yong Hong

5 Apr 2019 · Coroner Sonia Hayes · London (South)

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of observation regime implementation

    “the observation regime advised by the GP was not implemented”
  2. 2. lack of risk assessment before call bell return

    “no risk assessment was carried out prior to making the decision to return his call bell”
  3. 3. lack of staff training in risk assessments

    “care home staff did not receive training in how to carry out risk assessments”
  4. 4. lack of interpreter for communication

    “no interpreter was sought in the meantime to assist with assessment of his needs”
  5. 5. lack of further clinical advice and social isolation

    “No further advice was Sought from the GP or other appropriate clinician and he was left in social isolation without any means to express his distress,”
  6. 6. lack of risk assessment and GP input

    “no risk assessment was conducted and no further Input from the GP waa sought”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningPatricia Cleghorn25 Jul 2016 · 2 years 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“No formal risk assessment was undertaken and staff failed to appreciate what drugs she had available to her.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“(c) no risk assessment was carried out prior to making the decision to return his call bell.”
Full chain: Lack of risk assessment before critical decision

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error