Skip to content
recurance

William Atherton

21 Dec 2018 · Coroner Yvonne Blake · Norfolk

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of medical review after ward round

    “no medical review of Mr [name redacted] took place after the ward round on 30th”
  2. 2. failure to recognise worsening condition

    “worsening condition was not recognised by the junior doctor reviewing the blood results”
  3. 3. absence of nursing observations

    “no nursing observations were carried out in the several hours whilst he waited to go home”
  4. 4. missed bowel obstruction warning signs

    “potential warning signs of a bowel obstruction were not recognised and acted upon”
  5. 5. incorrect EWS documentation

    “documentation was incorrectly filled in (early warning scores EWS) and thus the proper escalation of treatment which this should have triggered did not take place”
  6. 6. inconsistent EWS scoring across departments

    “different department at QEH appear to complete EWS differently results in inconsistent scoring and the potential to not escalate treatment of a patient who needs it”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error