Skip to content
recurance

Warren Sampson

6 Sept 2016 · Coroner Caroline Beasley-Murray · Essex

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of written evidence of contributory input from other agencies

    “The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare”
  2. 2. lack of process for following up non-attendance at Reception Healthcare first night screening

    “lack of a process for following up non- attendance at the Reception Healthcare first night screening”
  3. 3. lack of system for ensuring officers are familiar with local directives and instructions

    “lack of a system for ensuring that all officers are familiar with local directives and instructions”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningGeraldine Kilborn10 Dec 2014 · 1 year 9 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.70 · moderate

Earlier report

“Witnesses confirmed that they often did not read much of the ACCT document prior to the ACCT review and relied more upon input of other attendees”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare.”
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT document review and agency input documentation
Raised again laterJohn Williams28 Mar 2017 · 7 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“The lack of a process for following up non- attendance at the Reception Healthcare first night screening”

Later report

“There was no second reception screen conducted. If Mr [name redacted] was not brought to healthcare staff for his second reception screen then healthcare staff needed to follow this up.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Missing follow up of non attendance at reception healthcare screening
Raised again laterDaniel Davey16 May 2019 · 2 years 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“The lack of a process for following up non- attendance at the Reception Healthcare first night screening”

Later report

“It was clear from evidence from prison and healthcare staff that it was not routine for healthcare to attend ACCT reviews.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Missing follow up of non attendance at reception healthcare screening

Responses

2016-0320-Response-from-Care-UK.pdf ↗· Care UK

Stated action · within 72 hours

“The process now is that a Second Health Screen is undertaken within 72 hours of an inmate arriving at HMP Chelmsford and at that second health screen there would be a Care UK Cltrncal SeMces llm,ted - Registered ,n England No 3462881 Registered Office Connaught House.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error