Skip to content
recurance

Walter Faulder

8 Jan 2024 · Coroner Nicholas Shaw · Cumbria

This report repeats 2 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. pedestrian crossing without proper signal

    “[the deceased] seems to have believed that as a pedestrian he had right of way, he may have been a bit confused having forgotten his wallet however the day before the collision be referred to the illuminated pole in the central refuge as a Belisha Beacon”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningKeith Harper21 Apr 2016 · 7 years 9 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“A driver exiting the roundabout has no prior warning of the crossing.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“[the deceased] seems to have believed that as a pedestrian he had right of way, he may have been a bit confused having forgotten his wallet”
Full chain: Insufficient lighting at pedestrian refuge
Repeats an earlier warningSteven Easdale13 Feb 2023 · 11 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“(1) That the lack of working lights on the pedestrian refuge on the B197 Digswell Hill (near the Red Lion Public House) poses a danger to road users and pedestrians.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“[the deceased] seems to have believed that as a pedestrian he had right of way, he may have been a bit confused having forgotten his wallet however the day before the collision be referred to the illuminated pole in the central refuge as a Belisha Beacon.”
Full chain: Insufficient lighting at pedestrian refuge

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error