Skip to content
recurance

Thomas Smith

9 Jul 2014 · Coroner Christopher Woolley · Cardiff & the Vale of Glamorgan

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate handover between primary and secondary care

    “No criticism is made of the actions of the Out of Hours Doctor . The inquest however revealed the importance of full and accurate handover between primary and secondary care providers. Such handovers should record full observations and details of any medication already given (for instance painkillers may mask fever). Can the clinical director confirm OOH doctors observe this practice.”
  2. 2. delayed pediatric assessment

    “The Coroner noted that it was only by chance that [the deceased] was seen more quickly than usual (because the case was”
  3. 3. delayed ambulance transfer for pediatric patient

    “The Coroner would ask that the OOH service notes the concern expressed below that [the deceased] should have been transferred to hospital by ambulance.”
  4. 4. conflicting meningitis antibiotic guidance

    “The Coroner notes the guidance at page 61 of the June 2010 publication”
  5. 5. snapshot vital sign monitoring

    “The inquest revealed the importance of observing physiological trends in the patient's condition, rather than observing readings on a”
  6. 6. nursing concerns ignored by doctors

    “The inquest revealed a somewhat fragmented approach to patient care, with nursing staff concerns not being acted on promptly by doctors. One expert highlighted the importance of a”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error