Skip to content
recurance

Thomas Jackson

13 Nov 2018 · Coroner Andrew Haigh · Staffordshire (South)

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 3 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. poor record keeping

    “During the hearing it was noted that on a number of occasions record keeping was poor. This can make continuity of care difficult and it can lead to matters being missed.”
  2. 2. inadequate multidisciplinary team meetings

    “It is apparent that patients do benefit from regular 'ward rounds' or 'multi- disciplinary team meetings' (there are a variety of titles) and, apart from the record of these meetings being very poor at times, there is a concern about the conduct of these meetings. In particular there appears to be on occasions inadequate consideration of the history in preparation for the meeting, failure of attendance of all appropriate personnel at such meetings and concern about the patient being able properly”
  3. 3. lack of awareness of Clozapine significance

    “However it appears that many staff are not aware of the significance of this medication particularly when considering potential side-effects and warning signs of deterioration.”
  4. 4. lack of patient education materials about smoking risks with Clozapine

    “| would not wish for patients or their families to be overloaded with paperwork but | wonder if there could be a simple leaflet available to patients and family members covering standard information about treatment generally but including matters such as the dangers of patients smoking whilst they are receiving Clozapine.”
  5. 5. lone-working policy gaps

    “| wonder if there needs to be a review of any lone-working policy or procedure with particular reference as to when to enter patients' rooms.”
  6. 6. inaccurate Serious Incident Review process

    “the SIR carried out in this matter contained a number of significant inaccuracies which can affect the validity of the process. Additionally although the records for patients who are in hospital for a long period of time can become voluminous there has also been some difficulty in disclosure of significant documents during the Inquest process.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningEdith Robinson19 Jul 2017 · 1 year 4 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

Earlier report

“the standard of record keeping by both doctors and nurses was poor.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“During the hearing it was noted that on a number of occasions record keeping was poor.”
Full chain: Poor record keeping in missing person investigations
Raised again laterGaia Pope-Sutherland21 Jul 2022 · 3 years 8 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“During the hearing it was noted that on a number of occasions record keeping was poor. This can make continuity of care difficult and it can lead to matters being missed.”

Later report

“there was evidence of poor record keeping, including records not being made, or when they were made not beinq sufficiently detailed and records beinq 3 retrospectively made and changed without the records being clearly marked that the entries were retrospective”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Poor record keeping in missing person investigations
Raised again laterJamie Pilkington22 Feb 2024 · 5 years 3 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“It is apparent that patients do benefit from regular 'ward rounds' or 'multi- disciplinary team meetings' (there are a variety of titles) and, apart from the record of these meetings being very poor at times, there is a concern about the conduct of these meetings.”

Later report

“There was no indication of next steps, timescales or when he could expect to be informed of the onward plan and no definite date when his case would be discussed with the Multi Disciplinary Team.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate multidisciplinary team meetings
Raised again laterLuke Worrell21 Feb 2025 · 6 years 3 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

This report

“However it appears that many staff are not aware of the significance of this medication particularly when considering potential side-effects and warning signs of deterioration.”

Later report

“The lack of awareness by a series of clinical staff of the potential fatal side effects of Clozapine”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of awareness of fatal side effects of clozapine

Responses

2018-0352.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action · 8 January 2019

“In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action.”

2018-0352-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action

“My officials have made enquiries with a number of bodies on the matter of concern in your report that there should be routine therapeutic blood monitoring (testing of blood plasma levels) in patients who are prescribed clozapine.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error