Skip to content
recurance

Theo Treharne-Jones

16 Oct 2025 · Coroner Gavin Knox · South Wales Central

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. unsupervised access to swimming pool by vulnerable child

    “[the deceased] was particularly vulnerable in that: 1. He had developmental delay; 2. He had no sense of danger; 3. He was prone to waking during the night; 4. He was fully mobile; 5. He loved swimming and had some sensory needs; 6. He was unable to swim.”
  2. 2. lack of physical barrier around swimming pool

    “The pool that [the deceased] was found in did not have any physical barrier in place to prevent uncontrolled or unsupervised access by children.”
  3. 3. inadequate room door security

    “[the deceased]'s parents recognised the risk of [the deceased] leaving the room unsupervised and attempted to mitigate this by locking the door and putting additional impediments in the way of the door including 2 pushchairs and an empty suitcase;”
  4. 4. absence of secondary door security

    “There was no secondary security measure such as a chain in place;”
  5. 5. fire safety lock design allowing child exit

    “The door locks in the hotel room were of a design to promote safety during a fire and could be easily disengaged from the inside;”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error