Skip to content
recurance

Scott Hooper

20 Mar 2017 · Coroner David Horsley · Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. incorrect weight recording leading to dosing error

    “On admission to SGH on 12 March, Mr [name redacted] weight was incorrectly recorded as 80kg when the reality was his true weight was 107 kg - a difference of 27 kg (4st 3.5Ibs) which is a considerable difference. This is important as the amount of anti-coagulant drugs to be given according to the SGH thromboprophylaxis protocol is calculated on weight”
  2. 2. unrecorded clinical decision

    “As stated above, on 15 March when the clinical decision was made to withhold the morning dose of Tpx medication it could not be ascertained who made the decision. This was a significant clinical decision and it is a basic requirement that all clinical decisions are recorded in order to capture capturing who made the decision and why”
  3. 3. limited dissemination of lessons

    “a single T2O M&M meeting is only effective for those doctors and nursing staff who attend. | was not given any other detail as to how the valuable lessons to be learned from this case were to be spread to clinical staff across the T&O department or the whole Trust as weight estimation can be equally important in many other medical specialisms”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Scott Hooper · Recurance