Skip to content
recurance

Sarah Chappell

7 Dec 2023 · Coroner Stephen Simblet · Inner North London

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. delayed transfer of patient

    “There was a ten day delay in Ms [name redacted] transfer from the Princess Royal Hospital to UCLH”
  2. 2. inappropriate clinical responsibility

    “the consultant urology surgeon in charge of Ms [name redacted] care was very firmly of the view that he was not the best clinician to fulfil this role”
  3. 3. failure to transfer care

    “Despite the agreement on 16 June of the gastroenterology clinical director that Ms [name redacted] care should be led by the gastroenterologists, they had not taken over her care by the time of her death,”
  4. 4. misunderstanding of acute condition

    “There was a frequent misunderstanding among the medical staff that Ms [name redacted] issues were all chronic”
  5. 5. inadequate pain management

    “the pain relief offered to Ms [name redacted] (principally simply paracetamol) was completely inadequate”
  6. 6. inappropriate nasogastric tube management

    “The management of the nasogastric tube that was crucial in attempting to avoid a fatal aspiration was inappropriate”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningMichael Brennan27 Mar 2017 · 6 years 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“I am concerned that this backup plan relied on the availability of a bed at a satellite hospital, which was ultimately not available when it was required.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“There was a ten day delay in Ms [name redacted] transfer from the Princess Royal Hospital to UCLH.”
Full chain: Unavailable bed leading to delayed patient transfer

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Sarah Chappell · Recurance