Skip to content
recurance

Ronald Hartley

17 Jul 2022 · Coroner Alison Mutch · Manchester South

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 6 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. delayed ambulance response

    “when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend and transport Mr [name redacted] to hospital”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningElizabeth Leah19 Feb 2015 · 7 years 5 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“On describing the circumstances, the Care Staff were told that they would get a call back from NHS within 60 minutes. They were also informed that there would be a delay of up to 6 hours for the ambulance to arrive.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend and transport Mr [name redacted] to hospital.”
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Raised again laterLee Dryden2 Aug 2023 · 1 year 1 month later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend and transport Mr [name redacted] to hospital”

Later report

“2. The Ambulance Service graded [the deceased]'s mother's call to them on the 15th December 2021 as a category 2 call which has two targets as described in evidence, the first being a response time of 20 minutes call time and that 9 out of 10 calls would be responded too within 40 minutes. Yorkshire Ambulance Service were unable to respond to [the deceased]'s call until 2 hours and 26 minutes had passed. Yorkshire Ambulance Service were on their highest level of escalation at that time with significant delays at”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Raised again laterGeoffery Hoad13 Sept 2023 · 1 year 2 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend”

Later report

“Due to continuing demand on the ambulance service, an ambulance did not become available until 08.16 hours.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Raised again laterJohn Winsworth29 Sept 2023 · 1 year 2 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend and transport Mr [name redacted] to hospital”

Later report

“The ambulance service was called at 11.55 hours on 14 February 2023 and the call was graded as a Category 3 call reinquire a response within 2 hours. The ambulancearrived at 09.30 hours on 15 February 2023. The time between calling the ambulance and the ambulance arriving on scene was in excess of 19 hours.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Raised again laterShaun Parks20 Dec 2023 · 1 year 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend and transport Mr [name redacted] to hospital”

Later report

“The ambulance response time of 3 hours and 18 minutes has likely affected the outcome.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Raised again laterJames Campion20 Dec 2023 · 1 year 5 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6 hours before one could attend and transport Mr [name redacted] to hospital”

Later report

“The delay in the ambulance dispatch prevented Mr [name redacted] receiving medical treatment and further psychiatric assistance”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Raised again laterPaul Burke2 May 2025 · 2 years 10 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“when they found Mr [name redacted] and rang for an ambulance they were told that due to the ongoing demands on the Ambulance Service that it would be approximately 6”

Later report

“Delay in ambulance response and the consequent delay in the provision of pre- hospital emergency care.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals

Responses

2022-0216-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action · 2023-24 and 2024-25

“The government is committed to supporting the ambulance service to manage the pressures it is facing, ensuring that people receive the treatment that they need when they need it. This will be supported by the government investing an additional £3.3 billion in each of 2023-24 and 2024-25 as announced in the Autumn Statement. This will enable rapid action to improve urgent and emergency care performance towards pre-pandemic levels. The NHS will set out detailed recovery plans in the new year.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error