Skip to content
recurance

Philip Hayes

30 Oct 2019 · Coroner Karen Dilks · Newcastle upon Tyne

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. delayed ambulance dispatch

    “Delay in ambulance dispatch Call categorised C2 received response 1 hour 2 minutes after original call”
  2. 2. failure to reassess C2 category

    “Failure to conduct reassessment of C2 category notwithstanding 5 subsequent calls describing additional symptoms and a deteriorating condition”
  3. 3. inconsistent algorithm application

    “Inconsistency in approach and answers to algorithm question designed to indicate risk of aortic aneurysm/rupture/dissection”
  4. 4. inadequate triage staffing

    “Calls triaged by health advisors with limited medical training and no medical qualifications”
  5. 5. inconsistent referral for clinical input

    “Inconsistency in approach to referral for clinical input”
  6. 6. inappropriate algorithm weighting

    “Appropriateness of triage by algorithm. Insufficient if any weight given to actual reported symptoms and indicators of a medical emergency”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error