Skip to content
recurance

Peter Walker

29 Jun 2023 · Coroner Nigel Parsley · Suffolk

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. pilots over 70 revalidating licences without independent assessment

    “no available evidence to suggest that [the deceased]'s age (87 years old), played a part in this tragic incident”

Linked reports

Raised again laterDorothy Nias20 Nov 2024 · 1 year 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“no available evidence to suggest that [the deceased]'s age (87 years old), played a part in this tragic incident.”

Later report

“Drivers over 70 are required to apply for a new licence every 3 years and there is no requirement for there to be any form of medical check or assessment to confirm fitness to drive.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of mandatory medical assessment for drivers over 70

Responses

2023-0217-Response-from-Department-for-Transport.pdf ↗· Department for Transport

Stated action · Q4 2023

“The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has accepted the recommendations issued by the AAIB and has commenced work to address them. This includes a project to look at the current Pilot Medical Declaration (PMD) system and whether it is fit for purpose. As part of this, the CAA has committed to the following: 1. Updating the CAA's PMD webpage with supplementary information for pilots. This will also include a link to information on the UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) website; 2. Updating”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error