Skip to content
recurance

Michael McMonigle

15 Aug 2016 · Coroner Crispin Oliver · County Durham and Darlington

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of knowledge of leave policy

    “The lack of knowledge of the policy for leave for informal patients amongst ward staff and the Consultant [name redacted] in particular.”
  2. 2. failure to conduct assessment before handover

    “The failure to follow the policy in terms of conducting an assessment prior to the handover.”
  3. 3. failure to communicate leave arrangements

    “The failure to apply the policy in terms of ensuring that leave arrangements are clearly understood by the patient and communicated to relatives.”
  4. 4. risk assessment not updated after formulation meeting

    “The Face risk assessment, PARIS case notes and intervention plan were not updated with assessment of risk of self-harm and suicide and details of conditions for escorted leave following the formulation meeting on 10”
  5. 5. delayed response to patient absence

    “Failure to respond to [the deceased]'s absence until well after 19:20 hrs, when it was admitted by ward staff in evidence that interventions could have been commenced, alternatively 21:00hrs when it was conceded that the alarm could have been raised given that that was the normal time for return from leave.”
  6. 6. non-compliance with Missing Patients Procedure

    “The response to [the deceased]'s absence did not conform with paragraphs 7.3 of the Missing Patients Procedure, ref. CLIN-0006-V4 in that there was no search of the hospital internally, a search of the grounds, enquiry with other staff users, check of CCTV footage.”

Linked reports

Raised again laterThomas Whitfield20 Apr 2017 · 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

This report

“The Face risk assessment, PARIS case notes and intervention plan were not updated with assessment of risk of self-harm and suicide and details of conditions for escorted leave following the formulation meeting on 10" August 2015”

Later report

“There is only one telephone call recorded in the Paris notes which does not make any reference to any such concerns.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Risk assessment not updated after formulation meeting

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Michael McMonigle · Recurance