Skip to content
recurance

Melanie Elms

7 Mar 2022 · Coroner Jessica Russell-Mitra · County of Surrey

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate care package

    “The care package arranged for [the deceased] following discharge from lengthy in-patient admission was not followed and was altered to something which the treating doctor did not consider adequate”
  2. 2. incomplete walk book

    “The walk book was not properly completed”
  3. 3. lack of extra planning for changes in circumstances

    “There was no extra planning for changes in circumstances: [the deceased] faced never being allowed to return to family life with her husband and son due to Child In Need proceedings; changes in medication and less support from family due to the Social Services requirements”
  4. 4. missing person plan absent

    “There was no missing person plan in place with timeframe and steps of escalation for [the deceased]'s leave”
  5. 5. inadequate risk assessment prior to leave

    “Risk assessment prior to leave was not adequate”
  6. 6. risk assessment not recorded

    “Risk assessment prior to leave was not recorded”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningKimberley Smith9 Dec 2020 · 1 year 3 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“- The timeframe for reporting informal patients to the police as missing persons if they fail to return at the agreed time.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“There was no missing person plan in place with timeframe and steps of escalation for [the deceased]'s leave.”
Full chain: Delayed reporting of missing detained patient

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error