Skip to content
recurance

Matthew Crowley

17 Feb 2016 · Coroner Patricia Harding · Mid Kent and Medway

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. delay in triage

    “A Rapid Access Treatment Protocol (RATT) was not in operation as a result of a busy A&E department which was short staffed. This resulted in a delay in triage”
  2. 2. delay in medical review

    “The patient was not seen by a doctor for 2 hours 20 minutes despite being PAR 5 and requiring therefore an immediate review by a senior doctor”
  3. 3. delay in decision making

    “There was a delay in ownership and onward management of the patient which resulted in timely decisions not being made. On call consultants responsible for those decisions were not aware of the patient deteriorating because they did not personally review the patient and were not informed of, or did not secure updated information themselves of how acutely unwell the patient was”
  4. 4. delay in transfer decision

    “Despite a vascular site declining to accept the patient until his renal function was optimised and a CT angiogram performed, a delay was caused by enquiries being made whether a second vascular site would accept the patient”
  5. 5. lack of transfer notification

    “The ITU of the hospital to which the patient was transferred were not informed of the transfer”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error