Skip to content
recurance

Martin Sullivan

2 Mar 2021 · Coroner Andrew Bridgman · Manchester South

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate MPDS script and algorithm

    “The MPDS script and algorithm, it seems, were inadequate in this instance to recognise the life-threatening situation that [the deceased] was in”
  2. 2. lack of direct questioning for ineffective breathing

    “Rule 6 of the MPDS Protocol recognises that asthma patients are generally very experienced in managing their disease. Noting that statements such as can't breathe and unable to breathe or a similar description should be considered as 2 ineffective breathing. Ineffective breathing eliciting a Category 1 response”
  3. 3. insufficient ambulance availability

    “This was clearly a busy shift for NWAS, notwithstanding that the service was at 97% of commissioned capacity. 111 ambulances instead of 112 - having increased from 67 circa one hour previously, and it is likely that crisis was probably building from the reduced numbers of ambulance over the earlier period”
  4. 4. ambulance arrival beyond target time

    “The EA that eventually arrived was outside the 90th percentile target of 40mins”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Martin Sullivan · Recurance