Skip to content
recurance

Mansoor Zaman

6 Feb 2026 · Coroner Graeme Irvine · East London

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. unauthorized patient return to ward

    “The failure of nurses on the ward to instigate an authorisation under S.5(4) MHA 1983 when Mr [name redacted] returned to the ward after absconding on the afternoon of 8th December 2024.”
  2. 2. inadequate documentation of observations

    “The failure of nursing staff on the ward to adequately document observations and care decisions.”
  3. 3. risk reassessment failure

    “The failure of Trust staff to reappraise the level of risk presented by Mr [name redacted] to himself and others in light of his erratic behaviour on 8th December 2024, specifically, a. His escape from the ward by violently kicking the fire exit door. b. His aggression toward the duty doctor during assessment. c. His assault upon a member of ward staff.”
  4. 4. repeated patient escape

    “His second escape from the ward in identical circumstances to the first. The failure of Trust staff to re-assess the frequency and quality of observations that Mr [name redacted] should be subject to during the afternoon of 8th December 2024.”
  5. 5. delayed doctor authorization

    “The failure of the duty doctor to act decisively and impose an authorisation under S.5 (2) MHA 1983 having been presented with an agitated patient who had minutes before escaped from the ward.”
  6. 6. delayed police reporting

    “The dilatory response of staff on the ward to report Mr [name redacted] as a missing person to the police, an action that did not happen for almost three hours after it was known that he had absconded.”
  7. 7. risk level misclassification

    “The categorisation of the risk presented by Mr [name redacted] as of a medium level by the nurse in charge when considering action to be taken after he absconded.”
  8. 8. incorrect police contact method

    “The use of the police 101 number as opposed to the required emergency 999 number to make the report.”
  9. 9. inadequate safety framework investigation

    “The inadequacy of the Trust patient safety framework investigation which neither sought the recollections of treating staff, nor communicated the findings of the report to the same staff.”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error