Skip to content
recurance

Kate Louise Pierce

20 Dec 2013 · Coroner John Gittins · North Wales (East & Central)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. failure to diagnose and treat Kate's condition properly

    “On the 29" of March 2006 [the deceased] was taken into the Wrexham Maelor Hospital where she was examined by a Dr . It appears from the evidence available that he failed to deal correctly with the diagnosis of [the deceased]'s condition and furthermore there is a belief that he may have misled the parents of [the deceased] by indicating that he had sought a second opinion from a colleague before discharging her when this was not in fact the case”
  2. 2. continued practice despite doubts about fitness to practice

    “My view is that this statement casts doubt on 7 aa fitness to practice and this is of grave concern as my understanding is that he currently continues to practice as a GP within my Coroner Area.”
  3. 3. legal time limit expired

    “in view of the elapse of a relevant time limit.”

Linked reports

Raised again laterThomas Warren14 Aug 2014 · 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

This report

“My view is that this statement casts doubt on 7 aa fitness to practice and this is of grave concern as my understanding is that he currently continues to practice as a GP within my Coroner Area.”

Later report

“Crucial information was held by the GMC about concerns about this doctor's fitness to practice, including his referral to NCAS. This information was not available to those enquiring about his fitness to practice at a subsequent time.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: GMC withheld fitness-to-practice information from employers

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error