Skip to content
recurance

Joshua Booth

16 Mar 2015 · Coroner Stuart Fisher · Lincolnshire (Central)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. substandard road section

    “The subsided section of road is seriously substandard and a danger to passing motorists and formed a contributory factor to Mr [name redacted] death. The section of road requires immediate repair.”
  2. 2. lack of warning signage

    “Appropriate signage needs to be erected to warn of the imminent danger of the road subsidence. The signage needs to be closer to the section of road in question and should include an appropriate advisory speed limit.”
  3. 3. dangerous posts at bank foot

    “The posts at the foot of the bank constitute a serious danger to vehicles leaving this section of road. An Armco barrier should be erected along this section of the road to provide security to passing motorists.”

Responses

2015-0125-Response-by-Lincolnshire-County-Council.pdf ↗· Lincolnshire County Council

Stated action

“The discrete section of road identified in your report which had been subject to subsidence has now been levelled with bituminous material to provide a more regular surface for the public.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Joshua Booth · Recurance