Skip to content
recurance

Jordan Howarth

1 May 2024 · Coroner Alison Mutch · Manchester South

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. withholding antibiotics without joint discussion

    “whilst there was input into [the deceased]'s care from both the microbiologist and the consultant physician there was not a joint approach to his care and no detailed discussions regarding the decision to withhold antibiotics”
  2. 2. lack of documented rationale for ICU admission refusal

    “Critical Care Outreach Practitioner had identified that [the deceased] needed to be moved to ICU urgently. This view had then to be ratified by the ICU Consultant if he was to be accepted into ICU. There was no documentation from the ICU consultant setting out their rationale for not examining [the deceased] at that point and for declining to admit him at that point”
  3. 3. failure to refer patients with NEWS2 score 5 to CC Outreach

    “anyone who had a NEWS2 score of 5 and no ceiling of care should be referred to the CC Outreach team. The inquest heard evidence that this was not followed on a number of occasions and the fact it had been missed was not identified by more senior members of the nursing team”
  4. 4. absence of multidisciplinary discussion and unclear care continuity

    “no evidence of a multi-disciplinary discussion/approach to assess his position fully and that it was unclear who was responsible for the continuity of his care”

Linked reports

Raised again laterCatherine Kirkham17 Jun 2026 · 2 years 2 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“there was not a joint approach to his care and no detailed discussions regarding the decision to withhold antibiotics”

Later report

“prescription of oral antibiotics without conducting a swallow assessment in a patient presenting with swallowing difficulties and lockjaw”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Antibiotic prescribing without joint discussion or swallow assessment

Responses

2024-0236-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action · September 2024

“The joint approach to Mr [name redacted] care from both the microbiologist and the consultant physician, specifically around the decision to withhold antibiotics.”

Stated action · September 2024

“The documentation from the ICU consultant setting out/not setting out their rationale, specifically no discussions' between the medical consultant and the ICU consultant within the medical notes”

Stated action · April 2024

“The Trusts' policy around NEWS2 escalation had not been followed”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error