Skip to content
recurance

Joleen Linton

25 Apr 2017 · Coroner Jason Pegg · Coventry

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. hourly observations

    “The practicality, adequacy and reliability of hourly observations”
  2. 2. assessment of patient breathing

    “Evidence indicated that in consequence of lighting, distance and obstructions it was not practical to reliably assess, through the door window, whether a patient was breathing”
  3. 3. inaccurate patient position recording

    “The recording of the patient's position in bed was not accurately recorded on the observation chart. At least one entry was, having regard to the evidence, obviously erroneous”
  4. 4. undetected chart errors

    “Potential areas of concern, in relation to the completion of the observation chart, were not detected on the night”
  5. 5. staff reluctance to enter rooms

    “There was a reluctance by members of staff to enter a patient's room to conduct observations”
  6. 6. policy clarity issues

    “The extant Trust policy, in relation to observations, lacks the necessary clarity, direction and succinctness that can readily be understood and applied by the members of staff who undertake the observations on the ward”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error