Skip to content
recurance

John Wilson

12 Jul 2017 · Coroner Andrew Bridgman · Manchester (South)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. product recall non-communication

    “more could have been done to ensure that the product recall came to the attention off and that the additional step required to do so was not an onerous one”
  2. 2. lack of follow up after second death

    “no further direct attempts were made either by registered post or recorded delivery or a second door knocking campaign following the second death in 2014”
  3. 3. aging recalled products fire risk

    “as the recalled products get older the risk of each of them catching fire increases”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

John Wilson · Recurance