Skip to content
recurance

Janine Kaiser

14 Jul 2015 · Coroner Margaret Jones · Stoke on Trent and North Staffordshire

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. pressure sore management failure

    “The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability N”
  2. 2. inadequate fluid and nutrition documentation

    “Records were difficult to interpret and did not accurately record times at which fluid and food had been offered to the deceased. The amounts taken by the deceased were not adequately recorded.”
  3. 3. inadequate staff training

    “Staff appeared inadequately trained in record keeping.”
  4. 4. staff continuity issues

    “There was poor continuity of staff.”
  5. 5. pressure mattress malfunction

    “Twice daily pressure mattress checks were fully completed indicating an appropriately functioning mattress. However when a mattress check was made by Tissue Viability Nurses the mattress was not alternating and the fault alarm on the mattress had been turned off. The attention of the staff was drawn to this but it was not subsequently recorded in the deceased's records. The staff were inadequately trained in pressure mattresses management. They apparently checked that the mattress had a power”
  6. 6. delayed tissue viability referral

    “Referral to Tissue Viability nurses should have been done sooner.”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error