James Francis
19 Jun 2019 · Coroner Penelope Schofield · West Sussex
A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.
The coroner's concerns
1. inadequate shift handover communication
“In my opinion there ts a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken”
2. delayed medical response
“Delay in calling a GP or making a 111 call for advice & information given to GP when”
3. inadequate clinical handover to emergency services
“the Ambulance crew received the call to attend Deerswood at 15 22 and arrived at 15 25 They reported that they found Mr [name redacted] on the floor leaning up against the dining room chair and over to his right side They accepted that they were assertive but felt this was born from a frustration to find a time critical patient in such a position and staff were unable to answer basic questions about past medical history, allergies, mobility, communications for current medication It”
4. insufficient staff training
“staff members that they had received no training at all or it was some time (up to 3 years) since they had had any basic first aid training”
5. lack of standardized clinical handover documentation
“In addition, the paramedic suggested that other care homes have a key document that can be instantly handed over to them to speed up the handover procedure and ensure that clinical staff have a full history key information This Is often called a Hospital Passport and uses simple traffic light alerts to highlight key information”
6. underestimation of minor trauma risks
“heard expert evidence from Prof [name redacted], consultant neurosurgeon and prehospital care specialist at Imperial College”
Linked reports
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
This report
“both key support workers who knew Mr [name redacted] best failed to carry out the 30 minute observations during the morning and afternoon shifts”
Later report
“pertinent general information about [name redacted] was missing from that handover sheet”
Responses
2019-0202-Response-by-NICE.pdf ↗· National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Stated action · September 2019
“The guideline is currently undergoing a surveillance review exercise to determine whether It should be updated As a result of your report, the review Is likely to conclude that an update is required so that it is clearer that the guideline applies to indirect head injury (for example, by making the definition more accessible to users) A final surveillance review decision Is due to be published in September 2019”
2019-0202-Response-by-Shaw-Healthcare.pdf ↗· Shaw Healthcare