Skip to content
recurance

James Colton

20 Jan 2015 · Coroner Geraint Williams · Worcestershire

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. missed developing cancer leading to early death

    “The doctors and nurses at the prison failed to properly diagonose, treat and care for Mr [name redacted] in that they assumed that the diagonosis of mechanical back pain was accurate and took no steps to revisit the diagonosis or to escalate his treatment despite his obvious continuing decline. The failure to consider alternate diagnosis led to them missing his developing cancer and which may, therefore, have contributed to his early death”
  2. 2. inadequate pain management causing distress

    “The procedure and processes for providing Mr [name redacted] with adequate anelgeasia were defective and there were occassions when Mr [name redacted] did not receive Tramadol to control his pain. This meant that his last days in prison were distressing and increasingly painful for him to the extent that he was at times unable to get off his bed to receive medication”
  3. 3. lack of continuity and coordination in care

    “There appeared to be no continuity of care for Mr [name redacted], little or no adequate communication as between Healthcare nursesand doctors, and no coherent plan for his care. There appeared to be no appropriate review of Mr [name redacted] care or treatment.”
  4. 4. inadequate resources leading to insufficient care

    “The evidence given was that there was an extremley heavy workload which meant {to quote one of the GP's who gave evidence) that he was unable to get on top of the work that was required-of him and that reviewing prisoners in Healthcare was not a priority.”

Responses

2015-0021-Response-by-Worcestershire-Health-Care-NHS.pdf ↗· Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust

Stated action

“Prior to addressing paragraph 6 of your PFD report | thought it was important to identify some of the learning that had taken place following the tragic death of Mr [name redacted]. | know that you will already be aware of the action plan that had been brought together taking account of the issues identified in the Prison and Probation Ombudsman report, Clinical Review and internal root cause analysis review. | understand that the action plan was submitted as part of the evidence at the inquest and you w”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error