Skip to content
recurance

Helen Sheath

27 Jan 2020 · Coroner Emma Whitting · Bedfordshire and Luton

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. delayed emergency response

    “from the information provided on this call, that [the deceased] had locked herself in the bathroom and was threatening to self-harm by ingesting a substance, the call handler selected the set of questions titled”
  2. 2. ambulance diversion

    “Although a Double Staffed Ambulance (DSA) was dispatched at 18.30 hours, it was diverted on route to a higher priority emergency call”
  3. 3. missed early intervention

    “If the first call had been coded as a Category 2, it seems likely that the RRV, Mental Health Street Triage Team (and even possibly the original DSA) would have arrived on scene much earlier (potentially just before or just after [the deceased] had ingested the sodium nitrate) which could potentially have altered the outcome.”

Linked reports

Raised again laterAran Bradbury24 Oct 2024 · 4 years 9 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“If the first call had been coded as a Category 2, it seems likely that the RRV, Mental Health Street Triage Team (and even possibly the original DSA) would have arrived on scene much earlier”

Later report

“The evidence I heard at inquest was that the call was coded at 25-C-1, which was as a Category 3 call.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inappropriate triage coding delays mental health ambulance response

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error