Skip to content
recurance

Hayley Smith

28 May 2022 · Coroner Catherine Wood · North East Kent

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of shared clinical records

    “Evidence given at the inquest revealed that there were seven different organisations involved in [the deceased]'s care all of whom had different systems for recording their clinical notes”
  2. 2. inadequate information sharing

    “The evidence given at the inquest revealed that each of the organisations were reliant on being copied into correspondence or on specific information being shared by others”
  3. 3. inadequate communication

    “The evidence at the inquest revealed that communication between those involved in her short life was inadequate and, as each ran separate clinical records systems, they could not access crucial information which could have made a difference ultimately meaning [the deceased] may not have died when she did”
  4. 4. barriers to data sharing

    “Evidence was given at the inquest that locally some steps have been taken to try to share key data between acute hospitals but there have been significant hurdles which have impeded the process namely, the different information technology systems used, licensing issues for the software, Data Protection requirements, confidentiality and consent issues as well as training and funding”
  5. 5. failure to share critical information

    “[the deceased] died following an out of hospital cardiac arrest on Christmas day 2019. If information been shared between different health care organisations particularly crucial information about [the deceased]'s CTO it is highly likely she would still be alive today”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error