Skip to content
recurance

Harry Mellor

22 Oct 2015 · Coroner Maria Mulrennan · Nottinghamshire

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of legal requirement to register or re-register a child with a General Practitioner

    “There is no legal requirement to register or re‐register a child with a General Practitioner”
  2. 2. no reliable system to identify when a child has been de-registered from a General Practice

    “There is no reliable system in place to identify when a child has been de‐ registered from a General Practice”
  3. 3. potential safeguarding concerns if a General Practitioner can de-register a child before a new General Practitioner has

    “There are potential safeguarding concerns if a General Practitioner can de‐register a child, particularly a child with chronic health needs, before a new General Practitioner has been identified and notified of the proposed de‐registration”
  4. 4. paediatric team and physiotherapy services not directly informed of de-registration

    “The paediatric team and physiotherapy services were not directly informed that [the deceased] was going to be de‐registered or had been de‐”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error