Skip to content
recurance

Hannah Bharaj

24 Jul 2019 · Coroner Alison Mutch · Manchester (South)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. ineffective discharge planning

    “discharge planning including communication with GPs and families around risk was not effective”
  2. 2. inadequate medication risk assessment

    “no clear evidence of consideration of discharge medication and risk around prescribing of medication post discharge from the EDU”

Linked reports

Raised again laterBarry Preston4 May 2020 · 9 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“During the time that [the deceased] was placed at the Priory the mental health trust who placed her did not have any discussion with [the deceased], her family or the Priory regarding the placement.”

Later report

“The inquest heard that whilst he was being treated in acute settings there was no coordination or ownership of his care. It was unclear as to who was making decisions and assessing suitability of placement.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of communication and care coordination in placement decisions
Raised again laterShaun Houghton25 Sept 2023 · 4 years 2 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“There was no clear evidence of consideration of discharge medication and risk around prescribing of medication post discharge from the EDU.”

Later report

“No medication was prescribed or dispensed to the Deceased at the time of self-discharge.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate discharge medication risk assessment

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error