Skip to content
recurance

Hannah Aitken

14 Nov 2024 · Coroner Anna Loxton · Surrey

This report repeats 3 earlier warnings, and was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. unrestricted domestic purchase of [REDACTED]

    “[REDACTED] can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions”
  2. 2. unrestricted import of [REDACTED]

    “[REDACTED] can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions”
  3. 3. inappropriate quantities and purity of [REDACTED]

    “The quantities and purity in which [REDACTED] are sold do not appear to be those required for their legitimate use”
  4. 4. lack of regulation and monitoring of [REDACTED] use

    “It does not appear there is any consideration of regulating/monitoring the use of [REDACTED] outside the limited provisions of the Poisons Act 1972”
  5. 5. limited reporting obligations for [REDACTED] under Poisons Act 1972

    “[REDACTED] are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious”
  6. 6. rising use of [REDACTED] for self-harm

    “The Court heard anecdotal evidence from three Emergency Medical Consultants and others witnesses that in their direct experience, the use of [REDACTED] for self-harm is increasing”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningJames Lacey29 Nov 2021 · 3 years earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“(1) relatively small quantities of can easily be purchased (2) a. is currently a "reportable substance" or "reportable poison" under Part 4 of Schedule 1 to the Poisons Act 1972.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“[REDACTED] are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious.”
Full chain: Insufficient controls on reportable poison and explosives precursor
Repeats an earlier warningChloe Macdermott19 Dec 2023 · 11 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The ability for UK users to purchase [REDACTED], through Amazon in the United States and to take delivery in the United Kingdom without effective border and/or custom controls.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“[REDACTED] can be purchased from abroad and imported to Great Britain with no restrictions;”
Full chain: Uncontrolled import of harmful substances via online retailers
Repeats an earlier warningJonathan Shaw25 Apr 2024 · 7 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The UK Border Force do not have the legal powers to seize a consignment of [REDACTED] because it is not a prohibited poison under the Poisons Act 1972.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“There are no restrictions on the import of [REDACTED] from abroad.”
Full chain: Insufficient controls on reportable poison and explosives precursor
Raised again laterMatthew O'Reilly23 May 2025 · 6 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“[REDACTED] are reportable substances under the Poisons Act 1972. The only obligation under this legislation is that domestic sellers must report reasonable grounds for believing transactions are suspicious.”

Later report

“Whilst there is a legal duty on persons selling this substance to report "suspicious" transactions within 24 hours to the Home Office, the purchase of small quantities is being presumed to be connected to the many legitimate uses of the substance”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Insufficient controls on reportable poison and explosives precursor
Raised again laterAndrew Kenward9 Jul 2025 · 8 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.96 · high

This report

“[REDACTED] can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions;”

Later report

“[REDACTED] can be purchased domestically with no restrictions save a duty on sellers to report suspicious transactions;”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Unrestricted domestic purchase of substance

Responses

2024-0622-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action

“The group has worked with businesses, including online suppliers and manufacturers of the substance, to reduce people's ability to purchase it for non-legitimate purposes including suicide, and to raise awareness around safeguarding concerns with businesses where required.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error