Skip to content
recurance

Frank Ospina

25 Oct 2024 · Coroner Lydia Brown · West London

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of R35 report for suicidal detainee

    “During the inquest evidence was heard about the use of Detention services order 09/2016 Detention centre rule 35 (2)”
  2. 2. closed visit without proper access

    “Visits. The inquest was advised that [the deceased]'s mother visited him in the Heathrow Immigration Removal Centre on one occasion, and that was conducted as a”
  3. 3. language barrier in visit booking

    “Frank's mother does not speak English and found it very difficult to arrange a visit”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningBranko Zdravkovic13 Feb 2019 · 5 years 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“they had received training and were told not to make a report under Rule 35(2) of the Detention Centre Rules (SI 2001/238) but instead to use the ACDT procedures to monitor suicidal tendencies.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Despite [the deceased] being witnessed as having made an attempt to take his life, and self- reporting a further attempt during his detention, no R35 report was made.”
Full chain: Lack of formal procedure for informing the Home Office when a detainee is placed on ACDT

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Frank Ospina · Recurance