Skip to content
recurance

Francis Langley

4 Sept 2017 · Coroner David Ridley · Wiltshire and Swindon

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. safety bedrails not engaged

    “the reason safety bedrails were not engaged is the fact that [the deceased] did not have a history of falls from bed”
  2. 2. risk assessment inconsistency

    “the assessment that was carried out on 12 February a few days before the fall from bed on 17 February 2017. In response to the question as to whether or not [the deceased] was at risk from falls from bed the answer was”
  3. 3. inconsistent risk assessment approach

    “The style is very different to the pital approach and in conjunction with this | have regard to a statement from ho was the Forest Ward Manager at the relevant time marked C.”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Francis Langley · Recurance