Skip to content
recurance

Elvon Morton

13 May 2024 · Coroner Graeme Irvine · East London

This report repeats 2 earlier warnings, and was raised again 3 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate documentation of care

    “Documentation of key stages in Mr [name redacted] care was poor or non-existent. Critical decisions on; mental capacity, best interests, the choice of sedation, the amount of drug administered, the method of administration and the timing of administration were not clearly recorded.”
  2. 2. flawed sedation decision

    “The decision to sedate Mr [name redacted] was flawed. The lack of contemporary documentation impeded an effective coronial investigation and review of that clinical decision.”
  3. 3. governance failure in incident identification

    “A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as a serious incident. This omission gives rise to a concern that future deaths may follow due to an inability on the part of the trust to identify, reflect upon, and remediate sub-optimal practice”
  4. 4. inadequate incident reporting and review systems

    “the trust's Datix incident reporting system, morbidity and mortality meeting process and SIRMAP procedure were inadequate. Each structure was siloed from the other, leading to inconsistent findings.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningNuala Seddon6 Feb 2017 · 7 years 3 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“It seems clear that a decision was made to transfer Mrs [name redacted] from ITU on 27 November 2014. There remains the potential that this decision was made by non-clinical staff.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The decision to sedate Mr [name redacted] was flawed. The lack of contemporary documentation impeded an effective coronial investigation and review of that clinical decision.”
Full chain: Inadequate documentation of clinical decisions
Repeats an earlier warningIris Fordham5 Oct 2023 · 7 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The poor quality of recording clinical records impeded the Trust's governance processes, in that the author of a serious incident investigation was unable to rely on clear evidence”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The lack of contemporary documentation impeded an effective coronial investigation and review of that clinical decision.”
Full chain: Governance failure in incident identification and poor quality of clinical notes
Raised again laterKenneth Foster12 May 2025 · 1 year later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“In this case the trust's Datix incident reporting system, morbidity and mortality meeting process and SIRMAP procedure were inadequate. Each structure was siloed from the other, leading to inconsistent findings.”

Later report

“In this case the trust's Datix incident reporting system, morbidity and mortality meeting process and PSIRF procedure were inadequate.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate incident reporting and review systems
Raised again laterTony Jackson23 Sept 2025 · 1 year 4 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as a serious incident. This omission gives rise to a concern that future deaths may follow due to an inability on the part of the trust to identify, reflect upon, and remediate sub-optimal practice”

Later report

“A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as an incident worthy of investigation through the Patient Safety Framework. This omission gives rise to a concern that future deaths may follow due to an inability on the part of the trust to identify, reflect upon, and remediate sub-optimal practice”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Governance failure in incident identification
Raised again laterMohammad Asghar29 Sept 2025 · 1 year 5 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.96 · high

This report

“A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as a serious incident.”

Later report

“A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as an incident worthy of investigation through the Patient Safety Framework.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Governance failure in incident identification and poor quality of clinical notes

Responses

2024-0258-Response-from-Barts-Health.pdf ↗· Barts Health NHS Trust

Stated action

“A specific induction programme has been formulated for the A&E which specifically covers themes such as the mental capacity act, contemporaneous documentation including emergency administered drugs with rationale, sedation and also escalation.”

Stated action

“The speciality medicine team have a teaching programme and induction of all levels of staff on Internal Professional standards and appropriate contemporaneous documentation.”

Stated action

“Teams will ensure that consultants on call confirm that they have remote access to the electronic healthcare record, this will eliminate the risk that documentation is not completed in relation to critical decisions.”

Stated action

“The Trust are supportive of staff that are increasingly managing high numbers of complex and acutely unwell patients. In this case, doctors sought and were provided with advice from a consultant on call. The consultant on call will attend to perform certain procedures (in line with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine guidance).”

Stated action

“The speciality medicine team have a teaching programme and induction of all levels of staff on Internal Professional standards and appropriate contemporaneous documentation.”

Stated action

“WXH have very carefully considered PFDs issued by the coroner in conjunction with late submissions and the impact this has on families, HM Coroner and ensuring preparedness for inquests. Steps have been taken to ensure that specialities have early sight of inquests.”

2024-0258-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Barts Health NHS Trust

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error