Skip to content
recurance

Dorothy Hoyberg

14 Jan 2026 · Coroner Melanie Lee · Inner North London

This report repeats 4 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate welfare monitoring of patient

    “On 19 June 2025 London Ambulance Service (LAS) were operating at REAP Level 4 (extreme pressure) and by 9am that day, targets were being breached. Multiple attempts were made to find an ambulance resource for [the deceased] but LAS were unable to meet targets for Category 3 patients and were struggling to meet targets for Category 2 patients. Welfare calls were made to [the deceased] until 12:25 at which point the demand on LAS was so high that there was no capacity to make any further welfare calls. Ideally welfare calls should have been made at least every 30 minutes but it was necessary for LAS to prioritise demand and deploy clinicians where they were most needed. Demand outstripped capacity. An ambulance should have reached [the deceased] within two hours but it took five and half.”
  2. 2. systemic capacity shortfall in ambulance services

    “I heard evidence that this is a pan-London problem, and it does not appear to be restricted to London. The demand on ambulance services is increasing and the number of patients requiring their services is increasing. Ambulance services are under extreme pressure and this is causing a systems challenge and long delays for patients.”
  3. 3. operational pressure level REAP Level 4

    “LAS are currently operating at REAP Level 4.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningMichael Bray22 May 2023 · 2 years 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“long delays in ambulance response to Category 2 calls create a risk that other deaths will occur in the future”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Demand outstripped capacity. An ambulance should have reached [the deceased] within two hours but it took five and half.”
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Repeats an earlier warningGeoffery Hoad13 Sept 2023 · 2 years 4 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The ambulance service was called again at 23.45 hours and the call was again coded as a Category 3 call.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“An ambulance should have reached [the deceased] within two hours but it took five and half.”
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Repeats an earlier warningSimon Boyd6 Nov 2024 · 1 year 2 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“notwithstanding the national target for Category 3 999 calls of 9 out of 10 responses within 120 minutes, the anticipated wait for a Category 3 ambulance on 1st June 2024 was around 3 hours and 15 minutes.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Multiple attempts were made to find an ambulance resource for [the deceased] but LAS were unable to meet targets for Category 3 patients and were struggling to meet targets for Category 2 patients.”
Full chain: Delayed ambulance handover at hospitals
Repeats an earlier warningAndrew Lewis19 Dec 2024 · 1 year 1 month earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“SCAS has been at REAP 3 or above for 90% of this time period. They have been constantly at REAP 4 since 9 October 2024.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“On 19 June 2025 London Ambulance Service (LAS) were operating at REAP Level 4 (extreme pressure) and by 9am that day, targets were being breached.”
Full chain: Sustained high operational pressure at REAP Level 4

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error