Diana Grant
24 Nov 2025 · Coroner Richard Travers · Surrey
This report repeats 4 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.
The coroner's concerns
1. detention in prison of mental health patients
“The evidence I received established that, despite changes made since the Deceased's death, including the recent introduction of NHS England's "Mental Health Crisis Care for Londoners: London's Section 136 Pathway and Health Based Place of Safety Specification", it remains extremely unlikely that such a person will be granted immediate admission to a secure mental health unit. This is principally because of the restricted capacity of the secure mental health unit estate, but also because of an expectation that some element of pre-planning will take place before such an admission occurs. Consequently, for many persons in the circumstances described above, detention in prison prior to transfer to a secure mental health unit continues to be unavoidable. The evidence I heard at the inquest suggested that although the expectation, in those circumstances, is that transfer from prison to hospital should take place within 28 days, the low availability of beds actually results in transfers taking, on average, as long as 80 to 90 days. Detention in prison of persons requiring mental health unit admission raises a concern for risk of death. The evidence I heard established that this is because a mental health patient's needs cannot be fully met in prison, even in a prison's health care wing. This is by reason of the fact that there is a material difference in the physical environment, the nursing and therapeutic regimes, and the access to psychological and other therapeutic treatments. Further, whilst medication and treatment can be given compulsorily in hospital, that is not the case in prison. The witness from whom I heard, stated that he was not aware of any work or review currently being undertaken to address the lack of capacity within the secure mental health unit estate or to address how the above risk may be resolved or managed.”
Linked reports
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high
Earlier report
“Prison was not the appropriate environment for someone with [the deceased]'s mental health problems.”
This report
“detention in prison prior to transfer to a secure mental health unit continues to be unavoidable.”
Identical hazardConfidence 0.97 · high
Earlier report
“the length of time taken to transfer prisoners in acute mental health crisis to a suitable secure hospital potentially puts lives at risk”
This report
“Detention in prison of persons requiring mental health unit admission raises a concern for risk of death”
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Earlier report
“The court heard that where a prisoner is assessed as being detainable under the Mental Health Act 1983, they ought to be transferred to hospital within 14 days, pursuant to the recommendations in the 2009 Bradley Report.”
This report
“The evidence I received established that, despite changes made since the Deceased's death, including the recent introduction of NHS England's "Mental Health Crisis Care for Londoners: London's Section 136 Pathway and Health Based Place of Safety Specification", it remains extremely unlikely that such a person will be granted immediate admission to a secure mental health unit.”
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Earlier report
“It is the case that a Health Based Place of Safety bed did become available but a decision was taken that due to anticipated demand for potential patients not to offer this to [the deceased].”
This report
“it remains extremely unlikely that such a person will be granted immediate admission to a secure mental health unit. This is principally because of the restricted capacity of the secure mental health unit estate”