Skip to content
recurance

Derrick Rivers

10 Mar 2014 · Coroner Lisa Hashmi · Manchester (North)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate drug administration protocol

    “the Local Authority and/or CQC, following their recent inspections of the care home, had not noted the inadequacies of the care home's drugs policy/drug administration protocol”
  2. 2. incomplete inspection of drug administration system

    “not all CQC Outcomes were considered at the last inspection, purportedly because they did not have anyone available to inspect and review the drugs administration system at the material time”
  3. 3. lack of awareness of non‑compliance with drug protocols

    “the care home owner and/or manager were purportedly unaware of the fact that carers were not following drugs administration protocols”
  4. 4. insufficient audit processes

    “the care home had little, if any, audit processes in place”
  5. 5. unfit drug administration protocol

    “the care home's drugs administration protocol was not fit for purpose and was tantamount to a 'hybrid' of other policies i.e. it was not specific to the care home environment”
  6. 6. non‑compliance with pharmacy identification requirements

    “the care home's policy did not meet the pharmacy requirements in terms of patient and drug identification (pod system)”

Linked reports

Raised again laterStephen Coulson27 Oct 2017 · 3 years 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“not all CQC Outcomes were considered at the last inspection, purportedly because they did not have anyone available to inspect and review the drugs administration system at the material time”

Later report

“Controlled drugs - the system in place for the administration, documentation and audit of processes associated with the use of controlled drugs”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Unaccounted controlled drugs in care home administration

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error