Skip to content
recurance

David Wilson

8 Jun 2023 · Coroner Kevin McLoughlin · West Yorkshire (Eastern)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of statistical risk rating

    “The Consent form signed by Mr [name redacted] was a standard pre-printed form. It did not attempt to provide any statistical rating for the risks identified, which would have enabled Mr [name redacted] to evaluate the risks.”
  2. 2. failure to tailor risk information

    “No attempt was made to interpret or tailor the risks inherent in the procedure in the light of his extensive medical history and co-morbidities.”
  3. 3. omission of death risk

    “The Consent Form did not refer to the risks of death, which befell him. He was thus not in a position to make a truly informed consent to undergo the sigmoidoscopy.”
  4. 4. lack of clinician identification

    “The Consent Form did not identify those clinicians involved in discussing the decision with him, save for who obtained his signature at a time when he was under the influence of morphine sedation.”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error